User talk:Aristeo/2006-05

Now that was one original freudian slip :) — Unsigned comment by Vook (talk • contribs)

Gahh.. I revised it before, but I did it again in the Summary. I blame it on a faulty "R" key. --Aristeo 03:26, 11 May 2006 (EDT)

---

Discussion submitted to Oblivion Talk:Glitches.

I agree, though I don't have any strong opinion on the title/location of the Oblivion:Glitches page. Just that User:Horseboy makes a mess of it by flaming, spamming etc. I reverted most and cleaned up the rest of his edits, but... I think the page could really use a split into sections. Something like:

• Exploits (game bugs and design decisions exploitable to your unfair advantage - 100% chameleon, permanent bound, duplication)
• Tips (counterintuitive exploitable design decisions - rest while swimming, 100% fame.)
• Tricks (Doing "forbidden stuff" without any advantage, while require serious effort. Get out of town, get past invisible walls, fall through floor)
• Goofs/Bloppers (steal staff from self, ladder in lighthouse - permanent silly goofs that just are there.)
• Random fun (Personal accounts of random fun accidents, non-repeatable - Radiant Stupidity, enemies follow you for a week)
• Problem bugs (things to avoid: crash game, break quest)

Add, change, modify, discuss or submit for public discussion at will.

Plain bad design decisions resulting in no advantage have their place in Oblivion:Gripes. — Unsigned comment by Vook (talk • contribs)

Just remember to assume good faith, and don't be too hard on the newbie. I agree with you that this page does get a lot of spam in general, and the page should be divided into sections. I like your section titles, but I have a couple of suggestions:

• I'm creating a page called "Oblivion:Cheats". Exploits, tricks, and tips should probally go there.
• "Random fun" will probally be a spam magnet, and should be in the discussion or not there at all.

--Aristeo 17:13, 16 May 2006 (EDT)

---

I'm more pwnage then you! And you know it, don't you? - Magnus

*Sigh* Indeed. It's true. :( --Aristeo 20:06, 31 May 2006 (EDT)